ccb-logo-vertical-shadowccb-logo-vertical-shadowccb-logo-vertical-shadowccb-logo-vertical-shadow
  • About Us
    • From the Director
    • Annual Report
    • Mission
    • History
    • Equipment Use Rates
    • Staff
    • Contact Information
  • What We Do
    • Education
      • Students
      • Internships
      • Public Presentations
    • Research
      • Species of Concern
        • Bald Eagle
          • Eagle Nest Locator
          • Annual Survey
          • Report a Nest
          • EagleTrak & Blog
          • Eagle Nest Blog
          • Facts About Eagles
          • Status in Virginia
          • Eagle Roosts
          • Migratory Populations
          • Eagle Video
          • Eagle Bands
          • Partners
        • Black Rail
          • Population
          • Protection Status
          • Threats
          • Working Group
        • Peregrine Falcon
          • Species Profile
          • Natural History
          • Falcon Populations
          • Virginia Reintroduction
          • Virginia Hacking
          • Virginia Monitoring
          • Virginia Management
          • FalconTrak
          • Report Falcon Sightings
          • Partners
        • Shorebird Roost Registry
        • Species of Concern Projects
      • Bird Migration
        • Bird Migration Projects
      • Human Impacts
        • Human Impacts Projects
      • Ecological Services
        • Ecological Services Projects
      • Tracking
        • Tracking Projects
  • Resources
    • Project Portal
    • Mapping Portal
    • Eagle Nest Locator
    • Publications
    • The Raven
    • Baker Library
      • Paul Seaman Baker
      • Contribute
  • News Room
    • News Stories
    • Press Releases
    • Media Coverage
    • Photo Essays
    • Conservation Stories
    • Blogs
      • EagleTrak Blog
      • Eagle Nest Blog
  • GIVE

Networking Eagles

  • Home
  • News Story
  • Networking Eagles
Flying to Mecca
March 30, 2018
A good year for woodpeckers
April 3, 2018
Published by Center for Conservation Biology at April 2, 2018
Categories
  • News Story
Tags

An adult eagle hunting within the upper Chesapeake Bay with a transmitter deployed by CCB. Movement information from 56 tracked eagles was used in a study to examine the structure of eagle roost networks. The first of its kind, the study provides important insight into the protection and management of eagle roosts.

By Bryan Watts | bdwatt@wm.edu | (757) 221-2247
April 2, 2018

Nonbreeding bald eagles are highly social and form communal roosts around profitable foraging sites.  We have known for decades that eagles frequently switch back and forth between different communal roosts but have lacked the movement information to evaluate the basic structure of roost networks.  The relatively recent development of GPS transmitters and other tracking devices that have enabled the remote tracking of large samples of eagles has opened a new era of data collection with the potential to view individual roosts within a network context.  Bryan Watts from CCB and Rodney Dyer from the Center of Environmental Studies at VCU have used movement data from 56 eagles outfitted with satellite transmitters to evaluate the roost network within the upper Chesapeake Bay.  The study entitled “Structure and resilience of bald eagle roost networks” was recently published in the Wildlife Society Bulletin.

An adult eagle hunting within the upper Chesapeake Bay with a transmitter deployed by CCB. Movement information from 56 tracked eagles was used in a study to examine the structure of eagle roost networks. The first of its kind, the study provides important insight into the protection and management of eagle roosts. Photo by Robert Lin.

The researchers used 14,464 midnight locations to determine the use of communal roosts and 2,634 movements between roosts on successive nights to evaluate the pattern of connectivity between roosts.  Among other findings, the study revealed that the structure of the 212-roost network was consistent with the well-known scale-free network.  The scale-free network is a common form where the majority of nodes (roosts in this case) have few connections to others and very few nodes (referred to as hubs) have many connections.  Hub roosts serve as bridges between large numbers of other roosts, have the shortest travel times to other roosts and the greatest overall influence on network functioning.  More than 50% of roosts were connected to fewer than 10% of other roosts and only seven had connections to more than 50% of the roost network.  Incredibly, the Sod Run roost on Aberdeen Proving Ground was connected to 204 (96.7%) of the possible 211 other roosts.  This roost was Grand Central Station and the central hub of the entire network.

Diagram of the bald eagle roost network within the upper Chesapeake Bay illustrating the interconnections between roosts. Circles indicate roosts where size is proportional to connectivity and associated with the contribution to function of the overall network. The darkness of lines indicate the strength of connections between roosts. Data from CCB.

Bald eagle communal roosts are protected by federal law.  Understanding the structure of roost networks helps us to make better decisions about roost protection and management.  One feature of the study was to evaluate the effect of losing individual roosts on the functioning of the overall network.  Not surprisingly, the effect of roost removal on overall network function was directly proportional to the connectivity of the roost being removed.  Removal of the majority (>90%) of individual roosts would have relatively little impact on the network.  The study identified 18 highly connected roosts that are important to network function and that should be the focus of any management strategy.

Whitewash and shed feathers are the telltale sign of a communal roost. This photo was taken under the Sod Run roost within Aberdeen Proving Ground that was shown to be the Grand Central Station of the upper Chesapeake Bay roost network. Photo by Libby Mojica.

Nestling eagle fitted with satellite transmitter. A cross-section of eagle age classes was tracked and included in the network study. Photo by Bryan Watts.

Results from the network study provide insight into the basic ecological question of why eagles gather together.  One of the proposed advantages of sociality in nonbreeding eagles is food finding through following behavior from communal roosts.  Some eagles have been shown to gain an advantage from associating with roosts by increasing their likelihood of finding or stealing food.  This benefit is believed to be particularly great for young, inexperienced eagles that have yet to master hunting skills and often resort to stealing or scavenging to meet their energy needs.  Hub roosts may represent concentrated information resources that may be visited periodically by eagles from throughout the network to stay in the information loop.

Share
Center for Conservation Biology
Center for Conservation Biology

Related posts

A tray of salt marsh Henslow’s sparrow specimens.

A tray of salt marsh Henslow’s sparrow specimens. These are some of the rare specimens that remain of birds that once nested in the salt marshes along the Atlantic Coast from Massachusetts through North Carolina. Photo by Bryan Watts.

March 21, 2023

Henslow’s Lament


Read more
CCB staff inspecting an RCW cavity with a telescoping pole

CCB staff inspecting an RCW cavity with a telescoping pole that reaches up to 50’ to inspect RCW cavities. This pole is typically used by electrical lineman to service transformers. Photo by Chance Hines.

January 11, 2023

RCW Cavity Creation Benefits the Surrounding Piney Grove Animal Community


Read more
A bald eagle nest just off the Poropotank River in Virginia in 2003.

A bald eagle nest just off the Poropotank River in Virginia in 2003. A nest with two equal young and ample food was a normal scene during this time period. This reflects a golden period during the late 1990s and early 2000s when males had more leisure time to hunt and provide for broods. Photo by Catherine Markham.

January 11, 2023

Chesapeake Eagles Shift Behavior


Read more

Comments are closed.

  • News Room
    • News Stories
    • Press Releases
    • Media Coverage
    • Photo Essays
    • Conservation Stories
    • Blogs
      • EagleTrak Blog
      • Eagle Nest Blog
      • OspreyTrak Blog

GET INVOLVED

Join the Nightjar Network or Become an Osprey Watcher Nightjar Network Osprey Watch

TRACK BIRDS ONLINE

Track Birds Online

READ

 News Stories
 Conservation stories
 Photo essays

News Archives

Stay Connected

Sign up for the CCB Newsletter:
* = required field

ABOUT US

From the Director
Annual Report
Mission
History
Staff
Contact us

WHAT WE DO

EDUCATION
Students
Internships
Public presentations

RESEARCH
Species of concern
Bird migration
Human impacts
Ecological services
Tracking

RESOURCES

Project Portal
Mapping Portal
Eagle Nest Locator
Publications
The Raven
Baker Library

NEWS ROOM

News Stories
Media Coverage
Press releases
Conservation Stories
Blogs

Give to CCB

GuideStar Logo

The Center for Conservation Biology
©2022 The Center for Conservation Biology